Citation Classics of Business Ethics †Free Samples to Students

Question: Discuss about the Citation Classics of Business Ethics. Answer: Introduction: The whistle blower is known as person who leaks out information about a person or an organization that has been involving itself in unfair practices (Near and Miceli 2013). The information is leaked out to public so that the unfair practices come to light. Edward snowden is the most recent entry to the list of whistle blowers and he worked for National Security Agency. Mark Felt was the whistleblower responsible for toppling Richard Nixon. He worked for the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Daniel Ellsberg was responsible for leaking the pentagon papers in 1971. He worked for the State Department management. The revelations of Edward lead to people questioning the security policies that were working in the government. Mark felt made it clear that Richard Nixon was not credible to hold the post of president due to the records that came in public. Daniel Ellsberg brought out the economic treachery that took place through the pentagon papers, he informed people of the money that was unlawful. The three people were jailed or under trail. These people have been denied citizenship of the country. For Edward Snowden, he is still on the run and is not allowed to enter the United States of America (Scheuerman 2014). Companies must have a positive attitude towards the whistleblowers because it is to be realized that they are doing the act bring the unlawful activities into light. The people mentioned have not done anything for their own profit; they worked to make the society better. The companies must safeguard such whistleblowers so that they know of their in house crisis in a better way. Reference Near, J.P. and Miceli, M.P., 2013. Organizational dissidence: The case of whistle-blowing. InCitation classics from the Journal of Business Ethics(pp. 153-172). Springer, Dordrecht. Scheuerman, W.E., 2014. Whistleblowing as civil disobedience: The case of Edward Snowden.Philosophy Social Criticism management, 40(7), pp.609-628.